Sunday, May 03, 2020

Did You Already Have Coronavirus Without Knowing It? Experts Explain Why That's Possible

 One 28-year-old woman developed a fever, dry cough, and shortness of breath during a trip to New York City in February, but her doctor assumed it was the flu. Was it actually COVID-19, and what would the implications be?

Toward the end of February, I traveled to New York City for a work trip. On day four or five, I started to feel ill. I did not have a thermometer, and so I did not think to take my temperature. But I was extremely tired, had a mild sore throat, developed a dry cough, and had trouble walking around the city due to shortness of breath.

Back home in Ann Arbor, Michigan, a week later, I was waking up in the middle of the night with coughing fits. The cough was “unproductive,” a term that I have now learned means I was not able to expel mucus. The coughing spells would be overwhelming, often leaving me hoarse and feeling like I was going to throw up. My shortness of breath was growing more persistent, as well. Generally active and an avid walker, I could barely take my dog outside for a few minutes a day before needing to sit down.

Finally after about two weeks, I went to see a doctor. “This just doesn’t feel like anything I’ve ever had,” I remember telling him. He listened to my lungs, which sounded more or less okay. He declared it “a virus,” insisting it might take two or three weeks to fully run its course. Coronavirus crossed my mind because of the shortness of breath, but very few people were talking about it at the time and it was only being reported on the West Coast. I thought to myself, If it was even possible, he’d test me, right? I did not realize how little testing was actually being done anywhere in the country at that time.

About one week after I got home from my trip on March 1, New York City’s first official diagnosis of COVID-19 was announced. Now that weeks have passed, I am recovered from that peculiar respiratory illness. And as I learned about the novel coronavirus, I have become more curious as to whether I may have contracted it in February.

Perhaps a lot of us are thinking about our most recent illnesses, and wondering the same thing as I am: was it a bad cold, the flu, or perhaps COVID-19? So I reached out to doctors who might be able to help me figure it out—and explain what it would mean if I did have the coronavirus.
Why anyone who was sick earlier this year might have had undiagnosed COVID-19

Scientists believe the virus emerged in China in December 2019. International travel continued throughout January, as cases popped up in other destinations—such as Australia, Bangkok, South Korea, France, the UK, Japan, and Russia. The US confirmed its first COVID-19 case on January 21. But the virus was already spreading other places, too.

By the time we recognized the start of the pandemic in the US, it’s very possible it was already here and well-established. Part of the problem in tracking the virus has been its vague symptom profile, which is relatively similar to symptoms you would have with the common cold or influenza, especially in the virus’s milder forms: dry cough, pressure of pain in the chest, shortness of breath, nausea, and diarrhea.

Pandemics start slow, but pick up heat as community spread begins. According to Greg Schrank, MD, MPH, an associate hospital epidemiologist at the University of Maryland Medical Center and COVID-19 response co-incident commander, epidemiological studies and genetic analysis of the virus indicate COVID-19 was likely “circulating in these epicenter communities for weeks to months” before those locations began to experience a surge of cases.


It’s not out of the realm of possibility that this virus has been spreading in the United States since the very early part of the year, perhaps in early January or very late December, Jagdish Khubchandani, PhD, MPH, an associate chair and professor of health science at Ball State University in Indiana, tells Health. “Given the timelines and incubation period reported by studies, it could be possible that many Americans had this infection way back and we are just now getting to see the severe most cases,” he says.

When the virus is just beginning to spread in a community, with low numbers of infected people, “the time it takes for the number of cases to double” was observed to be a week or more, Dr. Schrank tells Health. “The doubling time is primarily determined by the incubation period along with the number of people that are actively infected and can spread the virus to others,” he says. “As the prevalence of infection increases in a community, this doubling time decreases, and the growth of the epidemic becomes exponential.”

Early on, the virus was likely making the rounds, but in relative stealth mode, misperceived as other common respiratory illnesses. Now that we have a critical mass of patients and improved testing access, we are starting to experience rapid doubling of the virus, which leads to exponential growth and a surge of infections. One problem of not testing early and widely is that we don’t currently know who’s been infected—which could provide important insight for individuals and the country at large.

The implications of knowing if you've been exposed

If you contract COVID-19 and then subsequently fight the virus off, the theory among many scientists is that you become immune to reinfection. Like similar coronaviruses, antibodies develop to help your body defeat the illness, and the body develops at least short-term immunity as those antibodies linger around after COVID-19 is gone.

This is why knowing who has immunity could be critical as we await a vaccine. “Many people will become infected,” William Schaffner, MD, a professor of medicine in the division of infectious diseases at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Tennessee, tells Health. “The question is, will we be able to determine who has been infected and who remains susceptible? We would have to test everyone to see if they have evidence in their bloodstream of proteins that would indicate they’ve been exposed.”

To look for those proteins, we need a screening method. “Laboratories are working to develop a blood test to look for antibodies which are a sign that a person was recently infected with COVID-19,” says Dr. Schrank. As of April 2, the FDA issued its first approval to Cellex, Inc. for a test that would allow medical professionals to look for antibodies. About 30 other companies have tests like this in the works, as well.

Of course, knowing if you were exposed and asymptomatic, or had a mild form of COVID-19 and now in the clear, would relieve a lot of stress and wonder. But nationally, knowing who’s immune could have broader implications. “It might, if it were quick and easy, determine who needs to be vaccinated and who doesn’t,” says Dr. Schaffner. He also says it could “help communities decide how open they could be again.”


Germany has been working on widely testing for immunity, so they can get certain people back to work sooner rather than later. Some leaders in the UK are also pushing for “immunity passports,” which would clear some essential workers to get back to their jobs by testing to see if they’ve been exposed to the virus.

Knowing who has already been affected is helpful because antibodies can also be used to treat COVID-19. “The FDA just approved use of antibodies from recovered patients for new cases as an emergency investigational new drug protocol,” says Khubchandani. On March 28, Houston Methodist in Texas became the first hospital in the country to offer a plasma transfusion for COVID-19; Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City also began offering them. The hope is that lending plasma with antibodies that developed in response to the novel coronavirus will help some patients overcome the disease easier.

What to do now

Dr. Schaffner senses that a lot of people will want to know if they’re immune. “We’d like to test first responders; many people of a certain age will want to know,” he says. Dr. Schaffner adds that it’s about making a test streamlined, so it can be made widely available.

If there’s a silver lining to this global pandemic, it’s that every ounce of the world’s scientific innovation is being thrown at the coronavirus right now. “We must remain optimistic, as all textbook and novel methods are being tried [to fight COVID-19],” says Khubchandani.

In the meantime, even if you think you may have been infected, it’s important to act like you’re supremely vulnerable—for your sake, and for others’ sakes—because there’s no way to know for sure. “Social distancing is absolutely key,” says Dr. Schaffner. “It is the thing we can do today to prevent acquisition of infection, because it’s transmitted within close contact. Mild symptoms or no symptoms, you can be contagious; anyone can just breathe out the virus, and if you are standing close, and could get infected.  That is why everyone has to maintain social distance, you can’t just focus on who has cold or fever.”

Personally, I’m hoping for that antibody test, so I can figure out my own level of immunity. But if I never get it and never learn if my illness earlier this year wasn't COVID-19, I’m more than okay practicing social distancing—to make myself and my community safer during this life-altering pandemic.

The information in this story is accurate as of press time. However, as the situation surrounding COVID-19 continues to evolve, it's possible that some data have changed since publication. While Health is trying to keep our stories as up-to-date as possible, we also encourage readers to stay informed on news and recommendations for their own communities by using the CDC, WHO, and their local public health department as resources.


This is only for your information, kindly take the advice of your doctor for medicines, exercises and so on.     

https://gscrochetdesigns.blogspot.com. one can see my crochet creations  
https://gseasyrecipes.blogspot.com. feel free to view for easy, simple and healthy recipes    
https://kneereplacement-stickclub.blogspot.com. for info on knee replacement

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, March 26, 2020

Asymptomatic Carriers May Still Transmit Coronavirus, Says New Research

The advice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization, and other reputable agencies on how to protect yourself from coronavirus is simple: wash your hands frequently, don't share personal items, and try to keep your distance from those who are showing symptoms. But now, new research and anecdotal evidence shows that even those without symptoms may be able to transmit the coronavirus.

While it's still unclear exactly how much of the current coronavirus outbreak has been fueled by asymptomatic, mildly symptomatic, or pre-symptomatic people, the risk is there, Nate Favini, MD, medical lead of Forward, tells Health. That's because people who are asymptomatic can still spread the virus and have high levels of the virus in their respiratory secretions, he says—something that is apparent from the rapid spread of the coronavirus. "Given the rapidity of the spread of COVID-19, it seems plausible that people who are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic could be playing a role in spreading the virus," he says.

Deborah Birx, MD, an American family physician who's currently serving as the response coordinator for the White House Coronavirus Task Force, has also voiced concern about potential asymptomatic carriers of the coronavirus. During a White House press conference Saturday, Dr. Birx mentioned that experts are still trying to understand people—mainly those under the age of 20—who don't have "significant symptoms": "Until you really understand how many are asymptomatic and asymptomatically passing the virus on, we think it's better for the entire American public to know that the risk of serious illness may be low, but they could be potentially spreading the virus to others," she said.

One instance of this possible asymptomatic spreading took place in Massachusetts during a recent Biogen conference at the Boston Marriott Long Wharf. According to CNN, the conference took place in February, and after the meeting was over, three employees tested positive for coronavirus—but a spokesperson for the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, via CNN, noted that those three employees didn't show symptoms during the meeting. As of Monday, 108 cases of Massachusetts' total 164 coronavirus cases have been linked back to the Biogen conference.

New research from various outlets also points to asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic carriers, which may count for a significant amount of transmission. One research letter, set to be published in the CDC journal Emerging Infectious Disease, found that that time between cases in a chain of transmission is less than a week, with more than 10% of patients being infected by somebody who has the virus but does not yet have symptoms. "The data suggest that this coronavirus may spread like the flu," Lauren Ancel Meyers, a professor of integrative biology at UT Austin, who was part of a team of scientists from the United States, France, China and Hong Kong, explained in a press release. "That means we need to move quickly and aggressively to curb the emerging threat."

Two more studies—neither peer-reviewed, but posted on MedRxiv, a pre-print server founded by Yale University, the medical journal BMJ and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York—found that pre-symptomatic people were responsible for an overwhelming amount of overall spread.

One of the studies, shared by Dutch and Belgian researchers, analyzed two coronavirus clusters in Singapore and Tianjin, China, and found that between 48% and 66% of the 91 people in the Singapore region contracted the infection from someone who was pre-symptomatic, while between 62% and 77% of the 135 people caught coronavirus from someone who had yet to show symptoms in the Tianjin cluster. The other study, shared by Canadian, Dutch, and Singaporean researchers and also looked at the Singapore and Tianjin clusters, found that the coronavirus was transmitted, on average, 2.55 days before symptom onset in Singapore and 2.89 days before symptoms onset in Tianjin.


And in February, researchers in China published a research letter in the Journal of the American Medical Association, outlining a case of an asymptomatic woman in Wuhan, China who reportedly spread the virus to five family members while traveling to Anyang, China—all of whom developed COVID-19 pneumonia. "The sequence of events suggests that the coronavirus may have been transmitted by the asymptomatic carrier," wrote the study authors.

Despite the most recent information and research, US agencies, including the CDC, maintain that the coronavirus is mainly spread by symptomatic people—but according to William Haseltine, PhD, president of the global health think tank ACCESS Health International, it's this way of thinking that may render the current mode of testing for the coronavirus in the US as "dramatically ineffective."

Instead, Haseltine recommends a testing system known as "contact tracing," which, he says, has already been implemented in Singapore and South Korea. The method involves testing everyone with symptoms first; then, after identifying those with the virus, attempting to find and test every person the infected individual has come into contact with over a period of two weeks. Essentially, says Haseltine, it's not necessarily about how many tests an area has, but how they're used. "You want to catch people early, before they get sick" he says.

The information in this story is accurate as of press time. However, as the situation surrounding COVID-19 continues to evolve, it's possible that some data have changed since publication. While Health is trying to keep our stories as up-to-date as possible, we also encourage readers to stay informed on news and recommendations for their own communities by using the CDC, WHO, and their local public health department as resources.


This is only for your information, kindly take the advice of your doctor for medicines, exercises and so on.     

https://gscrochetdesigns.blogspot.com. one can see my crochet creations  
https://gseasyrecipes.blogspot.com. feel free to view for easy, simple and healthy recipes    
https://kneereplacement-stickclub.blogspot.com. for info on knee replacement

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, March 04, 2017

Things to Know About Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is not a woman's disease.In fact, it's considered to be the most common form of cancer among American men - affecting 1 in 7 during their lifetime - according to the American Cancer Society. Statistics show that 60% of cases occur in men over the age of 65 - though it does strike men at a younger age too. Here are 4 things every woman should know to protect her loved ones, be they her husband, father, or brother. 

1. Most men don't have any symptoms Advanced stage prostate cancer may cause trouble urinating - this includes a slow stream or going to the bathroom frequently - or blood in the urine, erection problems, or, in the very late stages (where it has spread to the bones), hip, back, or chest pain. But more often than not, prostate cancer shows no symptoms. 
2. Screening is vital
The American Urological Association insists on regular screening for men over the age of 50. While it is recommended that at age 50 men should discuss with their primary care physician, whether or not they should undergo the PSA blood test, which measures levels of a chemical called prostate-specific antigen, it hasn't been shown to be 100% accurate. Although it is a simple blood test, it does have a high rate of false positives, which can lead to painful, unnecessary biopsies. 
In fact, only about 25% of men with a moderately high PSA level actually have prostate cancer. And even when they do, the disease is very slow-growing. Unfortunately though, there isn't a better way, as yet, to detect prostate cancer. So getting checked at the age of 50 may seem like their best alternative. If however they have risk factors like being African-American or a family history, they may need to check as early as 40.
 
3. Not everyone with prostate cancer needs treatment A Harvard study conducted in 2013 found that about 70% of prostate cancers are low risk. This means that the tumor is so small and growing so slowly it will never become life-threatening. The study found that these men are better off choosing 'active surveillance' - meaning that they postpone treatment indefinitely while their health care team closely monitors their case. In fact, it is at times advised to watch and wait, as treatment can cause significant side effects such as impotence and leaking urine.
Backing this theory up, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine said that patients with early stage prostate cancer who opt for the approach aren't any more likely to die from the disease compared to those who immediately go for surgery and/or radiation. If prostate cancer has been detected and a watch and wait approach has been chosen, frequent visits to the doctor to check PSA levels are required. 
4. Steps can be taken to reduce the risk
According to some research, a low fat diet, especially a diet low in animal fat, can help reduce the chances of developing prostate cancer. Cutting back on dairy may also prove to be beneficial. In another Harvard study, men who ate the most milk, cheese and yogurt each day had the highest risk. You may also want to get your men to cut back on the booze. One Canadian study found that just two drinks a day could increase a man's risk by 23%.
 this is only for your information, kindly take the advice of your doctor for medicines, exercises and so on.
https://gscrochetdesigns.blogspot.com. one can see my crochet creations
https://gseasyrecipes.blogspot.com. feel free to view for easy, simple and healthy recipes 
https://kneereplacement-stickclub.blogspot.com. for info on knee replacement
 

Labels: , , , , , , , ,