Sunday, September 13, 2026

Listen to women in pain

In college, I had a friend who felt compelled to attend classes and theatre practice, despite debilitating pain, on the first day of her period. On more than one occasion, in the middle of practice, I was met with the sight of blood pooling at her feet. In my early teen years, when I experienced irregular and painful periods, the doctor informed me that I was “just not used to” the monthly cycle of blood and discomfort. When abnormal hormonal fluctuations triggered an autoimmune condition, one which leaves me bedridden for days at a time, doctors had no answers for me for a long time.

Recently, India’s first genome-wide study of endometriosis shed some light on the role genetics play in the manifestation of the condition. It is a great step in addressing the underrepresentation of South Asian people in the genetic research on the condition. It opens the door for more research, conversation, and a deeper understanding of a condition that has been criminally understudied and misunderstood.

While the broadening public dialogue and scientific research are positive signs, the larger question remains: Why are reproductive disorders so poorly understood? Why do women, across history and geographies, have their pain dismissed and minimised when they seek help?

The answer is as simple as it is unjust: Society and medicine still hesitate to take women and their pain seriously.

For 4,000 years, a wide range of physical and mental illnesses in women were labelled hysteria — with barely any cures beyond spells, sexual abstinence and condemnation. Today, it can take several years and doctors for women to be diagnosed with PMOS. For endometriosis, it can take up to 12 years for a confirmed diagnosis. In the meantime, the damage only compounds.

Across the world, and in India in particular, women are lauded for their pain tolerance — menstruation, childbirth and menopause — and derided if they complain. Author Hilary Mantel, in a 2004 essay on her experience with endometriosis, wrote, “People talked — and still do — of a ‘low-pain threshold’. I didn’t want anyone to think I had that.” Thankfully, she didn’t have that. Instead, several years later, of course, she discovered what she had was endometriosis. And the payment for the diagnosis was “part of my bladder and my bowel, my womb and my ovaries.”

In India, in particular, where menstruation is still considered a taboo in large swathes of the country, and speaking of reproductive health, let alone any abnormalities around it, is shrouded in shame, fear, and ignorance, the conversation is far from where it needs to be. Chronic pain and illness are an incredibly isolating reality to contend with. Having that experience compounded by stigma, cruelty, and gendered bias makes the cost much higher for women’s physical and mental health and future.

After 12 years of hospital visits and unexplained illness, my friend was finally diagnosed with endometriosis. A delayed diagnosis culminated in several surgeries, and an adequate resolution remains a pipe dream. At 17, I was diagnosed with Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome (PMOS). A few years after that, I finally had a diagnosis for the autoimmune condition. By then, the damage was serious enough that even with the best care, a surgery, at this point, seems unavoidable.

A society that refuses to treat its women with care and their pain with dignity can only reproduce similar patterns in medicine. This is why medicine alone cannot do the work. It needs a society that doesn’t rank women’s pain, one that cares enough to listen. The question is: Do we care enough to change?

 

 

This is only for your information, kindly take the advice of your doctor for food, medicines, exercises and so on.   

 

 

 

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, September 11, 2026

Endometriosis care in India needs to change: Women deserve a diagnosis, not just painkillers

 Most of the women I operate on have been in pain since their teens. By the time they reach me, they  reach me, they have usually seen several doctors, been prescribed several painkillers, and been told at least once that period pain is normal and they should manage it. Some have been investigated for irritable bowel syndrome. Some have been sent to a psychiatrist. Very few have been examined properly with endometriosis in mind....

That is the real problem in endometriosis care in India. Not a shortage of painkillers. A shortage of people willing to take the pain seriously and then find out what is causing it.

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease in which tissue similar to the lining of the uterus, causing inflammation, adhesions, scarring and progressive damage to pelvic organs. It affects roughly one in ten women of reproductive age, close to 190 million people worldwide. Diagnostic delay is routinely reported at anywhere between four and twelve years. In my practice, the longer end of that range is far more common.

Pain is a symptom, not a diagnosis

Painkillers have a role. Anti-inflammatories genuinely help a large number of women get through a  working day, and I do not quarrel with them. My objection is to the point where a prescription becomes a substitute for diagnosis.

If a woman needs medication every month to function, that is not a treated patient. That is an undiagnosed one.  Pain severe enough to interrupt work, sleep, intimacy, mobility or education deserves an explanation , not just suppression.

Hormonal therapy is a treatment, not a diagnostic strategy.

Combined pills, progestins and GnRH analogues can reduce pain considerably, and for many women  they are the right long term choice. They are a legitimate part of the toolkit and I use them.

What concerns me is the pattern I see repeatedly. A woman is started on hormonal suppression, feels  somewhat better, stops being investigated, and returns five years later with a frozen pelvis, a hydronephrotic kidney or bowel disease that now requires a far bigger operation than it once would have.Medical therapy controls symptoms. It does not stop deep disease from progressing in every patient, and it does not tell you what is actually inside the pelvis. If a woman is put on suppression, someone still needs to know what is being suppressed.

You do not need surgery to diagnose endometriosis

The old dogma that diagnosis requires a laparoscopy has held this field back for decades, and it is out of date.  In experienced hands, dedicated pelvic ultrasound and MRI can map deep disease accurately: the extent of a nodule, involvement of the bowel or bladder, ureteric compromise, obliteration of the pouch of Douglas. That mapping is what allows a properly planned operation instead of an exploratory one.

Surgery is not a last resort, and it is not too aggressive

There is a persistent narrative that endometriosis surgery is overdone and too radical. The harm I see is rarely caused by too much surgery. It is caused by inadequate surgery: repeated diagnostic laparoscopies, ablation of the surface of a nodule that extends deep into the rectovaginal septum, a cystectomy done in a way that costs a young woman her ovarian reserve, disease left behind because the surgeon was not equipped to deal with the bowel, ureter or nerve.

Done properly, the objective is complete clearance of disease with maximum preservation of function. That means nerve sparing dissection to protect bladder, bowel and sexual function, preserving ovarian tissue in women who want to conceive, choosing shaving or disc excision over segmental bowel  resection wherever the disease permits, and having colorectal and urology colleagues in the room when it does not. Radical about the disease, conservative about the woman. Those two things are not in conflict, and treating them as if they are is what leaves patients under-operated.

The recurrence conversation needs to be more honest

Patients are frequently told that surgery is pointless because endometriosis always comes back. That statement does not survive contact with long-term data. In the ten-year follow-up of the ENDORE randomised trial, most repeat operations were driven by ovarian endometriomas and adenomyosis  rather than by recurrence of the deep disease that was originally excised.

This distinction is not academic. It means a well-executed excision offers durable relief, and it means the counselling before surgery should be specific: what is being removed, what is being left, what is likely to need attention later, and what is realistically expected in terms of pain and fertility. Vague reassurance and blanket pessimism are both failures of consent.

One surgeon cannot treat this disease alone
Endometriosis does not respect the boundaries of gynaecology. It affects bowel, bladder, ureters, nerves, and in some women the diaphragm and chest. Its consequences extend into fertility, mental health, work and relationships.

Serious endometriosis care therefore requires a team: gynaecological surgeons, colorectal surgeons, colorectal surgeons, urologists, fertility specialists, pain physicians, pelvic floor physiotherapists and  mental health professionals working to the same plan. Pelvic floor physiotherapy and cognitive behavioural approaches are not consolation prizes offered when surgery is refused; they treat the central sensitisation and muscular dysfunction that persist after the disease itself has been cleared. For a woman who wants a child, fertility planning belongs in the first consultation, not the one after surgery.

From managing pain to restoring a life

The question I want this field to stop asking is how to get a woman through her next period. The question worth asking is how she gets the next twenty years back.

That requires believing women the first time they describe their pain, examining properly, imaging competently, operating on them completely when operating is indicated, and building care around what they actually want from their lives rather than around what is convenient to prescribe.

Pain relief matters. But if all we do is dull the pain, we have not treated anything. Good endometriosis care should give a woman an accurate diagnosis, a clear explanation of her own anatomy, a plan built around what she wants from her life, and the chance to stop organising that life around her pain.




This is only for your information, kindly take the advice of your doctor for food, medicines, exercises and so on.   































Labels: , , , , , , ,