Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Risk-Based Screening Improves Skin Cancer Detection After Transplant

 skin cancer 

A new analysis from Kaiser Permanente Northern California has confirmed that solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients face a dramatically higher risk of skin cancer compared with nontransplant patients. The retrospective cohort study, which included 2083 transplant recipients and 26,199 matched controls, found a 7.8-fold increase in post-transplant skin cancer risk among SOT recipients. The elevated risk stems largely from long-term immunosuppressive therapy, which weakens the body’s ability to repair DNA damage from ultraviolet exposure.

Given the rising number of transplant survivors worldwide, clinicians have been seeking more efficient ways to identify those at greatest risk. The Skin and Ultraviolet Neoplasia Transplant Risk Assessment Calculator (SUNTRAC) was developed to help stratify patients based on established risk factors such as transplant type, age, skin type, and UV exposure history.

SUNTRAC Program Improves Early Detection

Researchers assessed the impact of a modified version of this tool, the KP‑SUNTRAC risk-based surveillance program, which was implemented across northern California health facilities between 2022 and 2024. Patients were categorised into low, medium, high, or very high risk for posttransplant skin cancer and monitored accordingly.

Following program implementation, screening rates improved significantly among those in the high‑risk (hazard ratio 1.98) and very high‑risk (hazard ratio 2.17) groups. The rate of first-detected skin cancer increased in these populations (hazard ratio 2.57), suggesting more effective early identification rather than a true increase in disease incidence. Importantly, health care utilisation remained stable, with no rise in dermatology visits or biopsy-related workload.

Implications for Targeted Screening

The findings demonstrate that risk‑stratified surveillance can optimise limited dermatology resources while improving cancer detection in those most at risk. Investigators concluded that KP‑SUNTRAC strengthens early diagnostic efforts without adding short‑term burden to the health system.

By enabling clinicians to focus screening intensity where it is most needed, programs like KP‑SUNTRAC could reduce long‑term morbidity and health care costs associated with late‑stage skin cancer in transplant recipients. This approach offers a practical model for personalised, cost‑effective prevention in immunosuppressed populations.


 

This is only for your information, kindly take the advice of your doctor for food, medicines, exercises and so on.   

Labels: , , , ,

Fixed Airway Obstruction Found in 33% of Severe Asthma Cases

SEVERE asthma (SA) is a heterogeneous condition, and a key factor influencing patient outcomes is whether airway obstruction is fixed or reversible. Recent analysis from the Severe Asthma Network in Italy (SANI) registry has provided new insights into the prevalence and characteristics of fixed airway obstruction (FAO) among severe asthma patients.

Fixed Airway Obstruction Versus Bronchodilator Responsiveness

Among 354 patients enrolled in the registry, 190 (53.7%) had airway obstruction, of whom 116 (60.1%) were classified as having FAO. This represents an overall FAO rate of 32.8%. Patients with FAO displayed significantly better asthma control than those with bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR), with 34.5% achieving well-controlled asthma compared with 20.3% in the BDR group. FAO patients also had higher asthma control test (ACT) scores (17.4 vs 15.2) and asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) scores (4.6 vs 3.8).

Hospitalisations and emergency visits were less frequent in FAO patients than in BDR patients, although overall exacerbation rates were similar. Interestingly, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels were lower in FAO patients (29.5 ppb) than BDR patients (46.0 ppb), suggesting airway calibre rather than type 2 inflammation contributed to differences in biomarker expression.

Potential Reversibility of FAO

The study also highlighted that FAO is not necessarily permanent. Transition from FAO to BDR or normal lung function was observed, particularly in patients with late-onset severe asthma (ages 30–39) and lower inhaled corticosteroid use. The Global Initiative for Asthma classification influenced this shift, with step 4 versus step 5 patients showing higher rates of improvement.

Implications for Clinical Practice

These findings emphasise the importance of phenotyping severe asthma patients. Identifying FAO can guide personalised management strategies, including monitoring for potential reversibility and optimising therapy based on airway obstruction type. This approach may improve patient outcomes and reduce unnecessary hospitalisations.


This is only for your information, kindly take the advice of your doctor for food, medicines, exercises and so on.   

 

Labels: , , , , , ,