Saturday, September 12, 2026

Infertility Test Reveals A Uterus Inside A 26-Year-Old Delhi Man: Know The Rare Condition Behind The Discovery?

A 26-year-old Delhi man seeking treatment for infertility was found to have a small uterus-like structure and fallopian-tube-like structures inside his abdomen, along with both testes located internally.

What doctors discovered during evaluation was unexpected, the case, as reported by news agency ANI, has drawn attention to a rare congenital condition and raised a common question—can men have a uterus?

According to the report, the man approached RG Hospitals in Rajouri Garden for primary infertility and was found to have azoospermia, meaning there were no sperm in his semen. Further investigations showed that both testes were undescended. An MRI revealed a uterus-like structure in the pelvis, while genetic testing showed a 46,XY chromosome pattern. Laparoscopic examination later confirmed a small, underdeveloped uterus and Müllerian structures associated with both abdominal testes.

One testis showed pre-cancerous changes known as Germ Cell Neoplasia In Situ (GCNIS). Given the long-standing undescended position of the testes and the elevated cancer risk, the Müllerian structures and both testes were removed.

Can Men Have a Uterus?

In the Delhi case, the condition remained hidden until adulthood because the man had typical external male characteristics and no obvious earlier symptoms that prompted investigation. (Representational Image of PMDS: NIH) 

Many are questioning, how can someone with typically male chromosomes and male physical development have structures that usually develop into the uterus and fallopian tubes?

We spoke to Dr Ankit Vaishnav, Consultant – Urology, Robotic Surgery & Renal Transplant Surgeon, Sterling Hospitals, Ahmedabad, who explained that such a finding can occur in a rare congenital condition called Persistent Müllerian Duct Syndrome.

“It may be surprising to discover that a man has a uterus. If such a discovery is made, however, it is not necessarily a uterus. It may be caused in rare instances by a congenital condition called Persistent Müllerian Duct Syndrome (PMDS)," he says.

In PMDS, some reproductive structures that would normally disappear during male foetal development remain in the body. These can include Müllerian structures such as the uterus and fallopian tubes, even though the person is phenotypically and genetically male.

The condition is extremely rare and can remain undetected for years, sometimes until adulthood.

What Makes This Case Unique?

During normal male foetal development, the testes produce Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH). This hormone signals the Müllerian ducts, embryonic structures that can otherwise develop into the uterus, fallopian tubes and other reproductive structures, to regress.

 

 “In PMDS, problems with producing AMH or with its effect can make this process not occur at all," Dr Vaishnav explains. “This means that there may be some internal structures like uterus and fallopian tubes." The condition can therefore coexist with male reproductive anatomy, rather than meaning that the person has undergone a change from one sex to another.

Many people may not know they have PMDS for years and years. They are typically male and may not exhibit any symptoms. It is frequently diagnosed as a chance finding when investigating undescended testes, inguinal hernia, infertility, or an abdominal imaging or surgery for a different medical problem.

In the Delhi case, the condition remained hidden until adulthood because the man had typical external male characteristics and no obvious earlier symptoms that prompted investigation.

What Are The Symptoms of Persistent Müllerian Duct Syndrome?

PMDS may not cause obvious symptoms during childhood or adolescence. Many people may not know they have the condition until doctors investigate another reproductive or abdominal problem.

Dr Vaishnav says, “PMDS is frequently diagnosed incidentally while investigating undescended testes, inguinal hernia, infertility, abdominal imaging or surgery for an unrelated medical problem."

In the Delhi case, the discovery happened during an evaluation for infertility. The patient’s testes had remained inside the abdomen and were severely atrophied. When testes remain inside the abdomen, the higher body temperature can impair sperm production over time. In this patient, the testes were already severely damaged, contributing to azoospermia. Fertility outcomes vary; some individuals may still have options through assisted reproductive techniques depending on residual testicular function.

Does PMDS Cause Infertility?

The presence of PMDS does not automatically mean a person will be infertile. “These patients may present with infertility as one of the causes of their medical attention and undescended testes and other associated developmental abnormalities can impact on their reproductive function," Dr Vaishnav says. “But PMDS does not mean that the person will be infertile."

Fertility depends on several factors, including the location and function of the testes and whether other reproductive abnormalities are present.

For this 26-year-old, doctors found azoospermia and severe testicular atrophy. The long-standing undescended testes were also an important concern.

Does Having A Uterus Mean A Man Can Become Pregnant?

Finding Müllerian structures inside a person with PMDS does not mean that the person has a normally functioning female reproductive system or can carry a pregnancy.

The uterus-like structure in PMDS is typically underdeveloped, and the reproductive anatomy and hormonal environment required for pregnancy are not present. The condition is a rare variation in embryological development rather than evidence that a male reproductive system can function as a female reproductive system.

Dr Vaishnav says, “The occurrence of PMDS in such an individual is very rare and highlights the complexity of human development." He adds that advances in imaging, hormonal investigations and genetic testing are making it increasingly possible to identify these congenital variations and provide appropriate treatment, counselling and long-term care.

The occurrence of PMDS in such an individual case is very rare and underlines the complexities of human development and the need for careful investigation when a male child has, for example, undescended testes or unexplained infertility.

 


This is only for your information, kindly take the advice of your doctor for food, medicines, exercises and so on.   

 

Labels: , , ,

Friday, September 11, 2026

Endometriosis care in India needs to change: Women deserve a diagnosis, not just painkillers

 Most of the women I operate on have been in pain since their teens. By the time they reach me, they  reach me, they have usually seen several doctors, been prescribed several painkillers, and been told at least once that period pain is normal and they should manage it. Some have been investigated for irritable bowel syndrome. Some have been sent to a psychiatrist. Very few have been examined properly with endometriosis in mind....

That is the real problem in endometriosis care in India. Not a shortage of painkillers. A shortage of people willing to take the pain seriously and then find out what is causing it.

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease in which tissue similar to the lining of the uterus, causing inflammation, adhesions, scarring and progressive damage to pelvic organs. It affects roughly one in ten women of reproductive age, close to 190 million people worldwide. Diagnostic delay is routinely reported at anywhere between four and twelve years. In my practice, the longer end of that range is far more common.

Pain is a symptom, not a diagnosis

Painkillers have a role. Anti-inflammatories genuinely help a large number of women get through a  working day, and I do not quarrel with them. My objection is to the point where a prescription becomes a substitute for diagnosis.

If a woman needs medication every month to function, that is not a treated patient. That is an undiagnosed one.  Pain severe enough to interrupt work, sleep, intimacy, mobility or education deserves an explanation , not just suppression.

Hormonal therapy is a treatment, not a diagnostic strategy.

Combined pills, progestins and GnRH analogues can reduce pain considerably, and for many women  they are the right long term choice. They are a legitimate part of the toolkit and I use them.

What concerns me is the pattern I see repeatedly. A woman is started on hormonal suppression, feels  somewhat better, stops being investigated, and returns five years later with a frozen pelvis, a hydronephrotic kidney or bowel disease that now requires a far bigger operation than it once would have.Medical therapy controls symptoms. It does not stop deep disease from progressing in every patient, and it does not tell you what is actually inside the pelvis. If a woman is put on suppression, someone still needs to know what is being suppressed.

You do not need surgery to diagnose endometriosis

The old dogma that diagnosis requires a laparoscopy has held this field back for decades, and it is out of date.  In experienced hands, dedicated pelvic ultrasound and MRI can map deep disease accurately: the extent of a nodule, involvement of the bowel or bladder, ureteric compromise, obliteration of the pouch of Douglas. That mapping is what allows a properly planned operation instead of an exploratory one.

Surgery is not a last resort, and it is not too aggressive

There is a persistent narrative that endometriosis surgery is overdone and too radical. The harm I see is rarely caused by too much surgery. It is caused by inadequate surgery: repeated diagnostic laparoscopies, ablation of the surface of a nodule that extends deep into the rectovaginal septum, a cystectomy done in a way that costs a young woman her ovarian reserve, disease left behind because the surgeon was not equipped to deal with the bowel, ureter or nerve.

Done properly, the objective is complete clearance of disease with maximum preservation of function. That means nerve sparing dissection to protect bladder, bowel and sexual function, preserving ovarian tissue in women who want to conceive, choosing shaving or disc excision over segmental bowel  resection wherever the disease permits, and having colorectal and urology colleagues in the room when it does not. Radical about the disease, conservative about the woman. Those two things are not in conflict, and treating them as if they are is what leaves patients under-operated.

The recurrence conversation needs to be more honest

Patients are frequently told that surgery is pointless because endometriosis always comes back. That statement does not survive contact with long-term data. In the ten-year follow-up of the ENDORE randomised trial, most repeat operations were driven by ovarian endometriomas and adenomyosis  rather than by recurrence of the deep disease that was originally excised.

This distinction is not academic. It means a well-executed excision offers durable relief, and it means the counselling before surgery should be specific: what is being removed, what is being left, what is likely to need attention later, and what is realistically expected in terms of pain and fertility. Vague reassurance and blanket pessimism are both failures of consent.

One surgeon cannot treat this disease alone
Endometriosis does not respect the boundaries of gynaecology. It affects bowel, bladder, ureters, nerves, and in some women the diaphragm and chest. Its consequences extend into fertility, mental health, work and relationships.

Serious endometriosis care therefore requires a team: gynaecological surgeons, colorectal surgeons, colorectal surgeons, urologists, fertility specialists, pain physicians, pelvic floor physiotherapists and  mental health professionals working to the same plan. Pelvic floor physiotherapy and cognitive behavioural approaches are not consolation prizes offered when surgery is refused; they treat the central sensitisation and muscular dysfunction that persist after the disease itself has been cleared. For a woman who wants a child, fertility planning belongs in the first consultation, not the one after surgery.

From managing pain to restoring a life

The question I want this field to stop asking is how to get a woman through her next period. The question worth asking is how she gets the next twenty years back.

That requires believing women the first time they describe their pain, examining properly, imaging competently, operating on them completely when operating is indicated, and building care around what they actually want from their lives rather than around what is convenient to prescribe.

Pain relief matters. But if all we do is dull the pain, we have not treated anything. Good endometriosis care should give a woman an accurate diagnosis, a clear explanation of her own anatomy, a plan built around what she wants from her life, and the chance to stop organising that life around her pain.




This is only for your information, kindly take the advice of your doctor for food, medicines, exercises and so on.   































Labels: , , , , , , ,