Saturday, May 02, 2026

A Study of Nearly 2 Million People Found That This Diet May Lower Cancer Risk

Key Points

  • A large new study found that vegetarian diets are linked to lower risks for several types of cancer.
  • Pescatarians—people who eat fish, not meat—also had lower cancer risk.
  • People who eat mostly poultry instead of red meat may have a lower risk of prostate cancer.
  •  

    Many of us want to do what we can to protect ourselves from cancer. And while many cancer risk factors are outside your control, a major new study suggests your daily eating habits may be one of the most powerful ways you can reduce your risk. Researchers analyzed health data from nearly 2 million people followed for up to 27 years and found that certain dietary patterns were linked to significantly lower risks for some of the most common cancers, including breast, prostate, kidney and colorectal cancer.

    The findings, published in the British Journal of Cancer, are a comprehensive look at how different ways of eating—vegetarian, pescatarian, poultry-based versus red meat–heavy—stack up against each other when it comes to cancer risk. Here’s what the researchers found and what it means for what you put on your plate.

    How Was This Study Conducted?

    This was a pooled analysis of nine prospective cohort studies—a type of research that follows people over time and looks at what happens to them. Participants were classified into five diet groups at the start of each study based on what they reported eating: meat eaters (those who consume any red or processed meat), poultry eaters (chicken and turkey but no red or processed meat), pescatarians (fish but no meat or poultry), vegetarians (no meat or fish, but dairy and/or eggs are included) and vegans (no animal products at all).

    In total, the analysis included 1,645,555 meat eaters, 57,016 poultry eaters, 42,910 pescatarians, 63,147 vegetarians and 8,849 vegans. Researchers tracked 17 different cancer types over follow-up periods ranging from six to 27 years. Results were adjusted for factors that could influence cancer risk, including smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, BMI, diabetes history and, for women, hormone use and reproductive history.

    What Did the Study Find?

    The study found differences in cancer risk across diet groups for several cancer types.

    Vegetarians had lower risks of pancreatic cancer (21% lower), breast cancer (9% lower), prostate cancer (12% lower), kidney cancer (28% lower) and multiple myeloma, a blood cancer (31% lower), compared to meat eaters. However, vegetarians also had a higher risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus—a type of throat cancer—at nearly double the risk of meat eaters.

    Pescatarians fared well across several cancer sites: their risk of colorectal cancer was 15% lower, breast cancer 7% lower and kidney cancer 27% lower than meat eaters.

    People who eat poultry but not red or processed meat showed a 7% lower risk of prostate cancer compared to meat eaters.

    Vegans had a 40% higher risk of colorectal cancer compared to meat eaters—a surprising finding. But researchers caution that this was based on only 93 cancer cases among vegans and that the increased risk did not hold up in all sensitivity analyses. They speculate that low calcium intake, which is common among vegans, may be a contributing factor, since calcium has been associated with lower colorectal cancer risk.

    The study has a few limitations to keep in mind. Diet was assessed at the start of the study and not tracked over time, so some participants’ eating patterns may have shifted. Dietary data was self-reported, which always leaves room for error. And the findings may not apply equally to populations outside Western Europe and North America, where most participants lived. The researchers also note that vegetarian diets vary widely—a diet heavy in refined carbohydrates technically qualifies, even though it offers far fewer health benefits than a vegetable- and legume-rich approach.

    How Does This Apply to Real Life?

    You don’t need to become fully vegetarian to potentially lower your cancer risk. This study suggests that even modest shifts in eating patterns may make a difference. Here are some practical takeaways:

    • Consider a pescatarian approach. Eating fish in place of meat showed some of the most consistent protective associations in this study, particularly for colorectal, breast and kidney cancers.
    • Fill your plate with plants. Vegetarian diets are generally higher in fiber, vitamins C and carotenoids, all of which may support cancer protection.
    • If you eat meat, think about the type. Even shifting from red and processed meat toward poultry was associated with lower prostate cancer risk.
    • If you’re vegan, pay attention to calcium and other nutrients. The study’s colorectal cancer finding in vegans may be tied to low calcium intake. But vegan options like fortified plant milks, almonds and leafy greens can all help you reach your calcium goals.

    Our Expert Take

    A large-scale new study in the British Journal of Cancer found that vegetarian and pescatarian diets are linked to lower risks for several common cancers, including breast, prostate, kidney and colorectal cancer. The research reinforces what nutrition science has suggested for years: diets built around whole plant foods, with less red and processed meat, appear to support long-term health.

     

     

    This is only for your information, kindly take the advice of your doctor for medicines, exercises and so on.   

     

    Labels: , , , , , , , ,

    The expert on 'super aging' breaks down the science — and grift — in anti-aging

     

    It's a strange moment for growing old. Longevity is a cultural obsession: Biohackers plunge into ice baths, influencers push peptides, and tech elites pour ungodly sums into chasing immortality. Medical breakthroughs using AI promise to help us predict and prevent disease before it begins. But what actually helps us age well?

    Cardiologist Eric Topol says the answer begins by rethinking what we're trying to optimize: not lifespan, or how long we live, but health span, the years free from major age-related diseases like heart disease, cancer or neurodegenerative illness.

    "The average American health span is 64," Topol says, referring to when disease is likely to set in. "But lifespan is 79 on average. So you've got a big gap of about 15 years where your health span has ended and your lifespan continues."

    Topol studies what determines one's health span and how we can change our experience of old age.

    At Scripps Research Translational Institute, where Topol is the founder and director, he studied the DNA of people over 80 who hadn't contracted a major chronic disease. Topol called them "Super Agers" and compared their genomes with the average population to uncover what advantages could be found in their genes.

    But Topol's team didn't find anything.

    "The stunning result was while there were some small differences, otherwise there was not much to be able to say this was a genetic story at all," Topol says. There was no secret DNA to a better elderly life. Topol discovered that what mattered more was a web of factors: exercise, sleep, social connection, de-inflammation, immune system health and preventive medicine. His findings suggest healthy aging may be shaped less by fate than by choices and, increasingly, by better predictive tools.

    He has become a champion for the ways that artificial intelligence will transform preventive medicine. From retinal scans that can flag risks for Parkinson's or heart disease, to models that may help predict Alzheimer's decades early, Topol sees AI shifting medicine from reacting to disease to getting ahead of it.

    "In the years ahead, we will regard AI's most important contribution as facilitating prevention," he predicts.

    But he is equally excited that the foundations of healthy aging are surprisingly low-tech. Exercise matters, with resistance and balance training. So does regular deep sleep. Staying socially engaged and spending time in nature both prove to be preventive factors.

    Topol points to emerging evidence that even some vaccines can help support immune resilience; for instance, he says, "We've learned that the shingles vaccine reduces Alzheimer's and dementia by at least 20 to 25 percent," purely by the ways it protects the immune system.

    So the most powerful longevity tools may not be glamorous quick fixes found in the links of an influencer's bio, which is why Topol is so skeptical of the tens of billions of dollars flooding the anti-aging industry.

    Whether it's cold plunges, "protein maxxing" or experimental peptides, he sees a marketplace growing faster than evidence can keep up. Specious claims about unregulated products, he says, are "just completely out of control."

    His advice is less seductive than a biohacker's blueprint, maybe, but more durable: Be wary of optimization fads. Stick to evidence-based opinions, "not eminence-based" opinions. Invest in habits, not miracles. Healthy aging isn't reserved for people with lucky DNA or elite resources. Even if one starts in midlife, evidence suggests lifestyle changes can add years of healthy living.

    Getting older, Topol argues in his book Super Agers, doesn't have to mean passively waiting for decline or believing the fate of your ancestors portends your own. It is something you can shape — perhaps not immortality, but more vibrant, enjoyable years.

     

     

    This is only for your information, kindly take the advice of your doctor for medicines, exercises and so on.   

    Labels: , , , ,