CT scan use for appendicitis diagnosis more frequent in children with cognitive delays
Computed tomography (CT) is used at a higher rate than ultrasound in children with developmental and cognitive impairments to diagnose appendicitis, even though CT scans increase radiation risk in smaller bodies. Additionally, these children have higher rates of postoperative emergency room visits and hospital readmissions after undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (surgical removal of appendix) than children with normal development, according to new findings presented today by researchers at the American College of Surgeons (ACS) 2020 Quality and Safety Conference VIRTUAL.
Appendicitis is one of the most common causes of abdominal pain in children overall, as well as the most frequent surgical emergency in patients under age 18.*
In children with cognitive impairment, however, appendicitis is much more difficult to diagnose because they cannot communicate to us quite as easily as other children about their symptoms, so it makes the diagnosis more challenging, said study coauthor Robert Cina, MD, FACS, associate professor of surgery at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
The researchers used
data from the ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS
NSQIP®) database to evaluate the impact of cognitive impairment in the
diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis in children. ACS NSQIP is a
nationally validated, risk-adjusted, outcomes-based program designed to
measure and improve the process of surgical care in participating
hospitals.
Outcomes comparisons
showed that children with cognitive deficits were slightly younger
(average age 10 versus 11) and had more CT scans performed than children
without developmental delays (55 percent versus 41 percent).
CT scans shouldn't be
automatically performed because there are long term risks of radiation.
"Our exploratory study suggests that physicians are deciding to use CT
scans over ultrasound initially," Dr. Cina said. "The reason may be that
children who are neurologically impaired cannot tell us specifically
about their symptoms, and as a result, they may be getting imaged more
often to help make the diagnosis."
The study also found
that length of stay was slightly longer in children with cognitive delay
(average 2 days versus 1 day).
In addition, this study
sheds light on other variables contributing to the differences in these
pediatric groups. "We need to develop tailored communication tools and
education for these children and their parents. Physicians should
closely monitor these patients during diagnosis and follow up to make
sure everything goes well," Dr. Parrado said.
"The takeaway from this
research is that we are treating the children with the best of our
ability, but there is still room for improvement," Dr. Cina said. "We
see that there is some inequity in how this fragile patient population
is undergoing imaging. But our study allows us to look at this issue in a
deeper way to see how we can improve the outcome for these kids. We
need to make sure that we use the same processes in making our diagnoses
as we would for others in regard to radiation."
A limitation of the study is that it's a retrospective study, the
researchers noted. More data points are needed to clarify the underlying
reasons for the differences in outcomes.