A SARS-CoV-2 antibody magnetic immuno-detection test
A new report, released on the preprint server bio Rxiv*
by researchers at the Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and
Applied Ecology, describes the development of an innovative serologic
test that could provide a fast, easy, and inexpensive method of
detecting high titers of antibody in the serum of SARS-CoV-2 infected
people.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19, which has affected over 6.59 million people worldwide and caused almost 400,000 deaths in just over five months. Asymptomatic infection is thought to be extremely common with this virus, making containment measures extremely difficult.
Thirdly, the identification of infected individuals in an accurate manner can help to understand the actual disease potential, risk factors, and transmission characteristics of the virus. Finally, serologic testing will be useful to determine how strong and how lasting natural immunity is. For all such testing, it is essential to develop rapid, inexpensive, and conveniently applicable methods that can be used at the site of care. At present, there are few such available.
Currently, the weak link in the serologic assays now available is the test antigen used. The strongest antigen is the spike (S) glycoprotein, which is targeted by neutralizing antibodies and is essential for virus entry into the host cell. The nucleocapsid (N) antigen is also immunogenic but cross-reacts with antibodies against other coronaviruses.
The S1 subunit of the S protein is typically recommended for specific detection of an immune response to SARS-CoV-2. Suitable tests, according to the above criteria, using this antigen, are not presently available.
Finally, specially designed magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are added to label the secondary antibodies, the unbound antibodies are washed out, and the magnetic read-out is then obtained with a portable device that uses frequency magnetic mixing detection technology (FMMD).
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19, which has affected over 6.59 million people worldwide and caused almost 400,000 deaths in just over five months. Asymptomatic infection is thought to be extremely common with this virus, making containment measures extremely difficult.
Why serologic testing?
The identification of infected individuals before they become symptomatic, if indeed they do, is therefore of the highest importance to public health measures. Another huge benefit is the ability to identify those who are immune, which could facilitate selective lockdown application in many regions while still allowing the resumption of economic activity, without unduly endangering public health.Thirdly, the identification of infected individuals in an accurate manner can help to understand the actual disease potential, risk factors, and transmission characteristics of the virus. Finally, serologic testing will be useful to determine how strong and how lasting natural immunity is. For all such testing, it is essential to develop rapid, inexpensive, and conveniently applicable methods that can be used at the site of care. At present, there are few such available.
Current assays and their limitations
One currently used point-of-care testing system is the lateral flow assay, which offers fast and easy testing on-site but is not sensitive or specific enough, besides lacking the ability to measure antibody concentrations. These are therefore inferior to laboratory-based test formats that use enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).Currently, the weak link in the serologic assays now available is the test antigen used. The strongest antigen is the spike (S) glycoprotein, which is targeted by neutralizing antibodies and is essential for virus entry into the host cell. The nucleocapsid (N) antigen is also immunogenic but cross-reacts with antibodies against other coronaviruses.
The S1 subunit of the S protein is typically recommended for specific detection of an immune response to SARS-CoV-2. Suitable tests, according to the above criteria, using this antigen, are not presently available.
The MInD Procedure
The use of Magnetic Immuno-Detection (MInD) could overcome this issue. This is a procedure based on immunofiltration, where an antigen-coated matrix is used to trap specific antibodies in the sample applied to the matrix by gravity flow. These antibodies are then detected using secondary antibodies.Finally, specially designed magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are added to label the secondary antibodies, the unbound antibodies are washed out, and the magnetic read-out is then obtained with a portable device that uses frequency magnetic mixing detection technology (FMMD).
How the Study was Performed
The current paper reports a proof-of-concept study of the use ofMInD vs. standard ELISA, in which the former performs
significantly better at specifically detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies
in human serum.
The researchers used a peptide derived from the S protein of SARS-
CoV-2 to coat the immunofiltration columns. Next, reactive
antibodies to this peptide were introduced at varying concentrations
into the columns and flushed through them. The specific antibodies
bound to the coated antigen and were thus enriched in the column
matrix.
They were then labeled using an isotype-specific biotinylated
antibody. Then superparamagnetic streptavidin-functionalized
magnetic particles were applied and flushed through the columns
to label the secondary antibodies. After incubation, the excess
MNPs were washed out, and the bound MNPs were detected using
the FMMD-based portable magnetic reader.
The measuring signals correspond to the amount of bound antibody
in the assayed sample.
Comparing the new method with laboratory-based ELISA, which
was performed on the same sample as a reference point., threw up
several observations.
Time-saving
The whole experiment took 161 minutes and can detect specificanti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at a range of 3.4 to 477 ng/mL. This
is extremely sensitive with respect to the typical IgG levels in human
serum, at about 10 mg/mL, and increasing when the individual is
exposed to the antigen.
Higher range, broader sensitivity
The commercially available test kits for specific anti-S1-subunitantibodies can pick up IgG antibodies in three-fourths of samples
within 10-20 days of infection. More sensitive assays might detect
antibodies early in the course of infection.
However, when compared to the ELISA assay, the MInD assay
was capable of detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a range of
2.95 to 2040 ng/mL, which is five times broader. This means the test
is far more sensitive than ELISA, with a lower detection limit, and a
wider range of detection. It also allows quantitative measurements
due to the broad dynamic range.
The procedure took only 42 minutes, which is only a quarter of the
time required for the ELISA assay, which shows its potential for
rapid testing. This can be further reduced by optimizing selected
steps, such as reducing incubation time to 5 minutes or even less
and using MNPs to which antigen-specific antibodies are already
bound. This would eliminate the need for incubation with secondary
antibodies.With these adaptations, the total assay time would be
below 20 minutes, which is comparable to that of a lateral flow
assay.
Future Improvements and Implications
Other important innovations would be the use of antigens derivedfrom the S1 subunit of the S protein,or multiple SARS-CoV-2 protein
antigens in a mixture. Control antigens from other human
coronaviruses should be tested to confirm the specificity of the
enriched antibodies.
Multiplex testing using a range of MNPs could facilitate the
detection of multiple subclasses of antibodies in a single assay.
This could be useful in that it not only demonstrates seroconversion
but also the phase of the infection, and the course of antibody
formation.Finally, optimizing the magnetic reader to a medical-
diagnostics instrument will make the test suitable for such
applications – such as including a barcode scanner and labeling
the columns with patient-specific barcodes. The cost of the
procedure is about a tenth or less of a typical ELISA,
making it ideal for use in doctors’ offices.
The potential for the use of a single pipette for the assay procedure
and the (perhaps battery-powered) magnetic reader device makes
the device appropriate for various medical applications. For
instance, it could be used in nursing and elderly care homes, or at
airports, for fast and convenient point-of-care testing.
Once a vaccine is available, the same method can be used to
monitor the emergence of antibodies and how long they last. Thus,
this technique can be used in multiple ways and at different time
points, as a fast and convenient point-of-care measurement
without extra cost or sophisticated equipment.
*Important Notice
bioRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive,
guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as
established information.